Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
NLR vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NLR returned −35.8% to QQQM's +15.2%, and QQQM charges 0.15% to NLR's 0.52%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about NLR and QQQM
Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 26, 2026 for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, and $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.
Pair scorecard
QQQM costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 51.0 points; QQQM is far larger, $108.8bn against $3.1bn.
| Measure | NLR | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −35.8% | +15.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 41.6%, high on Jan 28, 2026 | |
| Below its high | 4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Nuclear and uranium | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 49.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $3.1bn | $108.8bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 61% | 46.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: NLR against ACWI, Apr 4, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.
QQQM returned more: +157.2% to +119.9%. QQQM swung less: 21.0% to 26.8%. QQQM fell less at its worst: −35.0% to −40.8%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | NLR | QQQM | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +119.9% | +157.2% | QQQM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +14.0% | +17.0% | QQQM | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +91.2% | +147.9% | QQQM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 26.8% | 21.0% | QQQM | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 18.0% | 13.6% | QQQM | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −40.8% | −35.0% | QQQM | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 79.1% | 99.6% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 96.4% | 99.8% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.99 | 1.00 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.54 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.50 | 0.70 | QQQM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.74 | 1.07 | QQQM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.046 | 0.147 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.34 | 0.49 | QQQM | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | ACWI | QQQ | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −3.5% a year | +0.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.90 | 0.62 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −11.1% to +4.1% | −0.2% to +0.4% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.22 | 0.10 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 16.7% | 0.4% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, NLR and QQQM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
NLR and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.
NLR
By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −35.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 49.2 pts. It sits 41.6% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
QQQM
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are NLR and QQQM in the same category?
- NLR is a thematic ETF and QQQM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, NLR or QQQM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NLR returned −35.8% and QQQM +15.2%.
- Which is cheaper, NLR or QQQM?
- QQQM is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NLR against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nlr-vs-qqqm
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). NLR against QQQM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nlr-vs-qqqm
[NLR against QQQM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nlr-vs-qqqm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.