Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
URA vs VTI: how they differ
Over the year VTI returned more, +17.2% against +7.0%, and VTI charges 0.03% against 0.69%.
Global X Uranium ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, URA and VTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in URA | Only in VTI |
|---|---|
| CAMECO CORP 22.39% | NVIDIA Corp 6.37% |
| SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM TR 6.46% | Apple Inc 5.88% |
| NEXGEN ENERGY LTD 5.88% | Microsoft Corp 3.84% |
| OKLO INC 5.12% | Amazon.com Inc 3.19% |
| URANIUM ENERGY CORP 4.72% | Alphabet Inc 2.90% |
| NAC KAZATOMPROM JSC-GDR REGS 4.42% | Broadcom Inc 2.48% |
| PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.15% | Alphabet Inc 2.29% |
| ENERGY FUELS INC 3.09% | Micron Technology Inc 1.80% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
| URA Global X Uranium ETF | VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Thematic ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Global X | Vanguard |
| What it is | Nuclear and uranium | US total market |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.0% | +17.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.5 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 88.3% |
| Holdings | 58 | 3531 |
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. It sits 50.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
VTI in plain words
VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, URA or VTI?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URA returned +7.0% and VTI returned +17.2%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, URA or VTI?
- URA charges 0.69% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do URA and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of URA and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are URA and VTI the same kind of fund?
- No. URA is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, URA against VTI, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ura-vs-vti Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources