Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IVV vs URA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IVV returned +13.7% to URA's −30.3%, and IVV charges 0.03% to URA's 0.69%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IVV and URA

Net assets: $885.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, and $5.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Uranium ETF.

At a glance
+13.7%
IVV total return, 1 year
−30.3%
URA total return, 1 year
0.03%
IVV expense ratio
0.69%
URA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 0.66 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 44.0 points; IVV is far larger, $896.3bn against $5.4bn.

IVV vs URA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVURA
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.7%−30.3%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high58.4%, high on Feb 2, 2011
Against its benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500Nuclear and uranium
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 43.7 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.69%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$896.3bn$5.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%63%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 12, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 832 weekly returns
IVV URA
Return
Total return edge IVV +743.7% −51.4%
Annualized edge IVV +14.3% −4.4%
Price return edge IVV +532.9% −68.7%
Risk
Volatility edge IVV 16.0% 36.8%
Max drawdown edge IVV −31.8% −93.2%
Downside capture 99.7% 127.6%
Beta 0.99 1.31
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IVV 0.81 0.02
Sortino edge IVV 1.18 0.02
Treynor 0.081 0.005
Calmar edge IVV 0.45 −0.05
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year −11.7% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.33 −1.54
Information ratio 0.00 −0.29
Tracking error 1.2% 30.7%

Each against its own benchmark: IVV against SPY, May 26, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026; URA against ACWI, Nov 12, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IVV returned more: +743.7% to −51.4%. IVV swung less: 16.0% to 36.8%. IVV fell less at its worst: −31.8% to −93.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IVV vs URA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVURAEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+743.7%−51.4%IVVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.3%−4.4%IVVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+532.9%−68.7%IVVPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.0%36.8%IVVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.0%25.0%IVVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.8%−93.2%IVVDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.3%120.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.7%127.6%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.991.31Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.32Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.810.02IVVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.180.02IVVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0810.005Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.45−0.05IVVAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYACWIThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year−11.7% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.33−1.54Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.5%−26.6% to +3.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.00−0.29Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.2%30.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 832 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IVV URA
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IVV
NVIDIA 7.92%
APPLE 7.61%
MICROSOFT 5.93%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.73%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.83%
BROADCOM INC 2.45%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.26%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.05%
Only in URA
CAMECO CORPORATION 22.18%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 6.74%
Oklo Inc 6.09%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.07%
URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 4.81%
Joint stock company National atomic company Kazatomprom 4.40%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP. 3.46%
PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.14%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF URA Global X Uranium ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Thematic ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Nuclear and uranium
Total return, 1 year +13.7% −30.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (SPY) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SPY −43.7 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.69%
Already in the S&P 500 99.8% 0.0%
Holdings 505 57
Net assets, IVV as of Oct 27, 2026 and URA as of Oct 12, 2026 $885.1bn $5.4bn

IVV and URA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-396E32634B

IVV and URA do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IVV follows S&P 500 and URA follows Nuclear and uranium.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IVV returned +13.7% and URA −30.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 44.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IVV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

URA

By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −30.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 43.7 pts. It sits 58.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.

Questions people ask

Are IVV and URA in the same category?
IVV is a stock ETF and URA is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, IVV or URA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +13.7% and URA −30.3%.
Which is cheaper, IVV or URA?
IVV is cheaper, by 0.66 percentage points a year. That is about $66 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and URA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 0% of URA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IVV against URA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-ura

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.