SCCR vs UITB: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jun 30, 2026 SCCR's duration was 5.8 years and UITB's 5.6; SCCR charges 0.16% to UITB's 0.38%. Net assets on Jun 30, 2026: $1.5bn for Schwab Core Bond ETF and $2.7bn for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF.
SCCR costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; UITB is 1.8 times larger.
| SCCR | UITB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.16% | 0.38% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.5bn | $2.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.7% | −1.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
| Below its high | 4.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 4.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCCR and UITB hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
3% in common
On the same fields
SCCR and UITB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCCR in plain words
SCCR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.16% a year. It sat 4.5% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
UITB in plain words
UITB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. It sat 4.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCCR or UITB?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCCR returned −1.7% and UITB −1.6%.
- Which is cheaper, SCCR or UITB?
- SCCR is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCCR against UITB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sccr-vs-uitb
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). SCCR against UITB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sccr-vs-uitb
[SCCR against UITB (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sccr-vs-uitb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.