QLC vs USMV: Differences, Returns & Fees
QLC and USMV hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and QLC returned +19.8% over the year. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Northern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETF, and $23.8bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.
USMV costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.3 points; USMV is far larger, $23.6bn against $1.0bn.
| QLC | USMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $1.0bn | $23.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.8% | +7.5% |
| What it tracks | Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) Index |
| Holdings in common | 25% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 37.6% | 15.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QLC and USMV hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
25% in common
On the same fields
QLC and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About QLC
QLC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 177 positions, with the top ten at 37.6%.
About USMV
USMV tracks the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +7.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 176 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QLC or USMV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QLC returned +19.8% and USMV +7.5%.
- Which is cheaper, QLC or USMV?
- USMV is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QLC against USMV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qlc-vs-usmv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). QLC against USMV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qlc-vs-usmv
[QLC against USMV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qlc-vs-usmv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.