PWV vs VONV: Differences, Returns & Fees

PWV and VONV hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and VONV returned +26.5% over the year. Net assets: $1.8bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Invesco Large Cap Value ETF, and $21.7bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF.

VONV costs 0.49 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.0 points.

PWV vs VONV: Differences, Returns & Fees
PWVVONV
Expense ratio0.55%0.06%
Net assets, PWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and VONV as of Sep 30, 2026$1.8bn$21.7bn
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+26.5%
What it tracksDynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex IndexRussell 1000 Value Index
Holdings in common19%
Holdings datedOct 10, 2026Aug 31, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund33.8%28.6%
Below its high6.5%, high on Sep 3, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+22.5%
PWV total return, 1 year
+26.5%
VONV total return, 1 year
0.55%
PWV expense ratio
0.06%
VONV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PWV and VONV hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

19% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding PWV VONV
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.29% 2.53%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 3.69% 1.78%
Chevron Corp 3.72% 1.02%
Bank of America Corp 3.05% 1.01%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 3.35% 0.94%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 2.96% 0.74%
Wells Fargo & Co 3.46% 0.70%
Morgan Stanley 3.08% 0.64%
Verizon Communications Inc 2.96% 0.56%
Walt Disney Co/The 3.41% 0.51%
Citigroup Inc 3.41% 0.50%
AT&T Inc 3.06% 0.47%
Only in PWV
Targa Resources Corp 1.50%
Cencora Inc 1.48%
ONEOK Inc 1.47%
Energy Transfer LP 1.46%
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 0.07%
SECURITIES LENDING - BNYM 0.00%
Only in VONV
Amazon.com Inc 6.14%
Apple Inc 5.58%
Microsoft Corp 5.01%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.50%
Johnson & Johnson 1.70%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.16%
Walmart Inc 1.12%
AbbVie Inc 1.11%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

PWV
Invesco Large Cap Value ETF
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +22.5% +26.5%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +26.4% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark not available +0.1 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 96.4% 89.2%
Holdings 52 869
Net assets, PWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and VONV as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.8bn $21.7bn

PWV and VONV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About PWV

PWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

About VONV

VONV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.5% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 869 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PWV or VONV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PWV returned +22.5% and VONV +26.5%.
Which is cheaper, PWV or VONV?
VONV is cheaper, by 0.49 percentage points a year. That is about $49 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PWV and VONV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of PWV and 89% of VONV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PWV against VONV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwv-vs-vonv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.