Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PTNQ vs QGRO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PTNQ returned +7.8% to QGRO's +1.8%; 25% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PTNQ and QGRO

Net assets: $1.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF, and $2.2bn on May 31, 2026 for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF.

At a glance
+7.8%
PTNQ total return, 1 year
+1.8%
QGRO total return, 1 year
0.65%
PTNQ expense ratio
0.29%
QGRO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QGRO costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.0 points.

PTNQ vs QGRO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePTNQQGRO
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.8%+1.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.6%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot IndexAmerican Century U.S. Quality Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.29%
Net assets, PTNQ as of Oct 27, 2026 and QGRO as of May 31, 2026$1.2bn$2.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common25%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.4%30.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 21, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 422 weekly returns
PTNQ QGRO
Return
Total return edge QGRO +152.6% +197.7%
Annualized edge QGRO +12.1% +14.4%
Price return edge QGRO +138.1% +189.5%
Risk
Volatility edge PTNQ 14.8% 21.8%
Max drawdown edge PTNQ −26.0% −31.5%
Downside capture 87.9% 97.8%
Beta 0.71 0.96
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PTNQ (slight) 0.66 0.60
Sortino edge PTNQ (slight) 0.95 0.88
Treynor 0.143 0.135
Calmar edge PTNQ (slight) 0.47 0.46
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.5% a year −0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.60 −0.20
Information ratio −0.21 −0.14
Tracking error 9.9% 7.3%

Each against its own benchmark: PTNQ against VOO, Jun 19, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026; QGRO against IWF, Sep 21, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QGRO returned more: +197.7% to +152.6%. PTNQ swung less: 14.8% to 21.8%. PTNQ fell less at its worst: −26.0% to −31.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PTNQ vs QGRO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePTNQQGROEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+152.6%+197.7%QGROPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+12.1%+14.4%QGROTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+138.1%+189.5%QGROPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.8%21.8%PTNQSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.3%14.7%PTNQLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−26.0%−31.5%PTNQDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture77.1%91.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture87.9%97.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.710.96Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.660.89Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.660.60PTNQ (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.950.88PTNQ (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1430.135Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.470.46PTNQ (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.5% a year−0.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.60−0.20Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.5% to +6.5%−5.6% to +4.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.21−0.14Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.9%7.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 422 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

25%

By the books each fund has filed, PTNQ and QGRO hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

25% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PTNQ QGRO
Apple Inc 7.52% 3.90%
NVIDIA Corp 8.06% 3.15%
Costco Wholesale Corp 1.93% 2.07%
Lam Research Corp 1.68% 3.07%
Applied Materials Inc 1.85% 1.50%
Netflix Inc 1.38% 3.10%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.29% 2.73%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.73% 1.12%
KLA Corp 1.09% 3.03%
Booking Holdings Inc 0.68% 1.19%
Intuitive Surgical Inc 0.57% 1.54%
Micron Technology Inc 4.25% 0.57%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PTNQ
Amazon.com Inc 4.84%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.56%
Alphabet Inc 3.23%
Broadcom Inc 3.06%
Intel Corp 2.08%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.24%
Linde PLC 1.01%
Amgen Inc 0.95%
Only in QGRO
TJX Cos Inc 3.23%
Mastercard Inc 3.10%
Arista Networks Inc 2.83%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.58%
Amphenol Corp 2.33%
Ralph Lauren Corp 2.23%
McKesson Corp 2.22%
General Electric Co 2.01%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +7.8% +1.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark −5.9 pts vs VOO +0.9 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.29%
Already in the S&P 500 94.9% 79.9%
Holdings 103 189
Net assets, PTNQ as of Oct 27, 2026 and QGRO as of May 31, 2026 $1.2bn $2.2bn

PTNQ and QGRO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-DC855A5180

PTNQ and QGRO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. PTNQ follows Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index and QGRO follows American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 25% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and May 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PTNQ returned +7.8% and QGRO +1.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PTNQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PTNQ

PTNQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.4%. It sat 4.6% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QGRO

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth.

QGRO tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 189 positions, with the top ten at 30.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PTNQ or QGRO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PTNQ returned +7.8% and QGRO +1.8%.
Which is cheaper, PTNQ or QGRO?
QGRO is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PTNQ and QGRO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of PTNQ and 80% of QGRO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PTNQ against QGRO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ptnq-vs-qgro

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.