Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QGRO vs TGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QGRO returned +1.8% to TGRW's −1.2%; 28% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QGRO and TGRW

Net assets: $2.2bn on May 31, 2026 for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF, and $1.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF.

At a glance
+1.8%
QGRO total return, 1 year
−1.2%
TGRW total return, 1 year
0.29%
QGRO expense ratio
0.52%
TGRW expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QGRO costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points.

QGRO vs TGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQGROTGRW
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.8%−1.2%
Drawdown
Below its high5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksAmerican Century U.S. Quality Growth IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.29%0.52%
Net assets, QGRO as of May 31, 2026 and TGRW as of Oct 27, 2026$2.2bn$1.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common28%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.9%58.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 14, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 323 weekly returns · each against IWF
QGRO TGRW
Return
Total return edge QGRO +120.7% +83.0%
Annualized edge QGRO +13.6% +10.2%
Price return edge QGRO +116.3% +81.9%
Risk
Volatility edge QGRO (slight) 20.1% 21.7%
Max drawdown edge QGRO −31.5% −42.6%
Downside capture 95.5% 104.8%
Beta 0.92 1.06
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QGRO 0.58 0.41
Sortino edge QGRO 0.87 0.61
Treynor 0.126 0.084
Calmar edge QGRO 0.43 0.24
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year −4.4% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.01 −2.74
Information ratio −0.13 −0.89
Tracking error 7.7% 4.1%
Reading

QGRO returned more: +120.7% to +83.0%. QGRO swung slightly less: 20.1% to 21.7%. QGRO fell less at its worst: −31.5% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QGRO vs TGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQGROTGRWIWFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+120.7%+83.0%QGROPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.6%+10.2%QGROTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+116.3%+81.9%QGROPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.1%21.7%QGRO (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.3%14.5%QGRO (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.5%−42.6%QGRODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture87.6%102.3%100.0%TGRWShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture95.5%104.8%100.0%QGRO (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.921.061.00QGRO lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.860.971.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.41QGROReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.870.61QGROReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1260.0840.126QGROReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.430.24QGROAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWFIWFIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year−4.4% a year0.0%TGRW significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.01−2.74Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.0% to +6.0%−7.5% to −1.2%QGRO's includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.13−0.89QGROReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.7%4.1%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 323 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

28%

By the books each fund has filed, QGRO and TGRW hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

28% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QGRO TGRW
Apple Inc 3.90% 5.90%
NVIDIA Corp 3.15% 13.88%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.58% 3.41%
Lam Research Corp 3.07% 2.27%
Mastercard Inc 3.10% 1.70%
Applied Materials Inc 1.50% 1.96%
Netflix Inc 3.10% 1.21%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.12% 3.16%
Amphenol Corp 2.33% 1.05%
Intuitive Surgical Inc 1.54% 1.02%
Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.83% 0.88%
KLA Corp 3.03% 0.80%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QGRO
TJX Cos Inc 3.23%
Ralph Lauren Corp 2.23%
McKesson Corp 2.22%
General Electric Co 2.01%
Corning Inc 1.86%
GE Vernova Inc 1.77%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc 1.69%
Comfort Systems USA Inc 1.52%
Only in TGRW
BROADCOM INC 5.74%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.88%
GE Aerospace 2.05%
AMAZON.COM INC 1.35%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC - A 1.07%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR-SP ADR 1.01%
ASML HOLDING NV NY 0.91%
SANDISK CORP 0.84%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +1.8% −1.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +0.9% (IWF) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark +0.9 pts vs IWF −2.1 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.29% 0.52%
Already in the S&P 500 79.9% 93.1%
Holdings 189 80
Net assets, QGRO as of May 31, 2026 and TGRW as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.2bn $1.1bn

QGRO and TGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-FE8DAB0DB4

QGRO and TGRW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. QGRO follows American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index and TGRW follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Holdings in common. 28% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 QGRO returned +1.8% and TGRW −1.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

TGRW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QGRO

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth.

QGRO tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 189 positions, with the top ten at 30.9%.

TGRW

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.

TGRW is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.52% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QGRO or TGRW?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QGRO returned +1.8% and TGRW −1.2%.
Which is cheaper, QGRO or TGRW?
QGRO is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QGRO and TGRW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 80% of QGRO and 93% of TGRW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QGRO against TGRW, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qgro-vs-tgrw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.