Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PTNQ vs XOVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PTNQ returned +7.8% to XOVR's −3.0%; 18% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PTNQ and XOVR
Net assets: $1.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF, and $2.2bn on Jun 30, 2026 for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
Pair scorecard
PTNQ costs 1.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points.
| Measure | PTNQ | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.8% | −3.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.6%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 6.5%, high on Oct 5, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 1.81% |
| Net assets, PTNQ as of Oct 27, 2026 and XOVR as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.2bn | $2.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 18% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 46.4% | 63.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PTNQ and XOVR hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
18% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PTNQ and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PTNQ and XOVR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. PTNQ follows Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index and XOVR follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 18% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PTNQ returned +7.8% and XOVR −3.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.8 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
PTNQ
PTNQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.4%. It sat 4.6% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XOVR
XOVR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.81% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PTNQ or XOVR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PTNQ returned +7.8% and XOVR −3.0%.
- Which is cheaper, PTNQ or XOVR?
- PTNQ is cheaper, by 1.16 percentage points a year. That is about $116 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PTNQ against XOVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ptnq-vs-xovr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PTNQ against XOVR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ptnq-vs-xovr
[PTNQ against XOVR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ptnq-vs-xovr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.