Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PWRD vs QGRO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PWRD returned −1.9% to QGRO's +1.8%; 15% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PWRD and QGRONet assets: $1.5bn on Jul 31, 2026 for TCW Transform Systems ETF, and $2.2bn on May 31, 2026 for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
QGRO costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.7 points.
| Measure | PWRD | QGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.9% | +1.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 19.1%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, PWRD as of Jul 31, 2026 and QGRO as of May 31, 2026 | $1.5bn | $2.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 15% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 52.0% | 30.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Feb 11, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 245 weekly returnsPWRD returned more: +95.8% to +75.0%. QGRO swung slightly less: 20.0% to 21.4%. QGRO fell slightly less at its worst: −22.9% to −24.5%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | PWRD | QGRO | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +95.8% | +75.0% | PWRD | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.3% | +12.6% | PWRD | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +90.9% | +72.2% | PWRD | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 21.4% | 20.0% | QGRO (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.4% | 13.1% | QGRO (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −24.5% | −22.9% | QGRO (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.58 | 0.48 | PWRD | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.86 | 0.74 | PWRD | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.63 | 0.55 | PWRD | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 245 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PWRD and QGRO hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
15% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PWRD and QGRO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PWRD and QGRO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. PWRD follows No index, actively managed and QGRO follows American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 15% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and May 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PWRD returned −1.9% and QGRO +1.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
PWRD
PWRD is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 57% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 19.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth.
QGRO tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 189 positions, with the top ten at 30.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PWRD or QGRO?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PWRD returned −1.9% and QGRO +1.8%.
- Which is cheaper, PWRD or QGRO?
- QGRO is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PWRD against QGRO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwrd-vs-qgro
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PWRD against QGRO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwrd-vs-qgro
[PWRD against QGRO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwrd-vs-qgro)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.