PWRD vs SPYG: Differences, Returns & Fees
PWRD and SPYG hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned +15.8% over the year. Net assets: $1.5bn on Jul 31, 2026 for TCW Transform Systems ETF, and $56.1bn on Oct 20, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF.
SPYG costs 0.71 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.0 points; SPYG is far larger, $52.2bn against $1.5bn.
| PWRD | SPYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $1.5bn | $52.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.2% | +15.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 52.0% | 60.2% |
| Below its high | 20.1%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | 4.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
PWRD and SPYG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. PWRD follows No index, actively managed and SPYG follows S&P 500 Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 9% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 PWRD returned −1.2% and SPYG +15.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 17.0 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PWRD and SPYG hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
9% in common
On the same fields
PWRD and SPYG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About PWRD
PWRD is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 57% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 20.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About SPYG
SPYG tracks the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 152 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PWRD or SPYG?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PWRD returned −1.2% and SPYG +15.8%.
- Which is cheaper, PWRD or SPYG?
- SPYG is cheaper, by 0.71 percentage points a year. That is about $71 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PWRD against SPYG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwrd-vs-spyg
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). PWRD against SPYG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwrd-vs-spyg
[PWRD against SPYG (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwrd-vs-spyg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.