Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
QGRO vs WINN: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QGRO returned +1.8% to WINN's +4.9%; 29% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about QGRO and WINN
Net assets: $2.2bn on May 31, 2026 for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF, and $1.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF.
Pair scorecard
QGRO costs 0.28 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points.
| Measure | QGRO | WINN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.8% | +4.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.3%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.57% |
| Net assets, QGRO as of May 31, 2026 and WINN as of Oct 28, 2026 | $2.2bn | $1.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 29% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 30.9% | 57.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Feb 11, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 245 weekly returnsWINN returned slightly more: +80.2% to +75.0%. QGRO swung slightly less: 20.0% to 22.1%. QGRO fell less at its worst: −22.9% to −29.8%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | QGRO | WINN | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +75.0% | +80.2% | WINN (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +12.6% | +13.3% | WINN (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +72.2% | +80.0% | WINN (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 20.0% | 22.1% | QGRO (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.1% | 14.6% | QGRO (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −22.9% | −29.8% | QGRO | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.48 | 0.49 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.74 | 0.74 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.55 | 0.45 | QGRO | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 245 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, QGRO and WINN hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
29% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
QGRO and WINN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QGRO and WINN are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. QGRO follows American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index and WINN follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 29% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 QGRO returned +1.8% and WINN +4.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth.
QGRO tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 189 positions, with the top ten at 30.9%.
WINN
WINN is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 3.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QGRO or WINN?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QGRO returned +1.8% and WINN +4.9%.
- Which is cheaper, QGRO or WINN?
- QGRO is cheaper, by 0.28 percentage points a year. That is about $28 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QGRO against WINN, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qgro-vs-winn
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). QGRO against WINN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qgro-vs-winn
[QGRO against WINN (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qgro-vs-winn)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.