Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PDBC vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to XLG's +6.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PDBC and XLG
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and $11.9bn for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLG costs 0.39 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 49.2 points; XLG is 1.5 times larger.
| Measure | PDBC | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +55.6% | +6.4% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Top 50 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $8.0bn | $11.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 98% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 60.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PDBC and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
XLG
XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or XLG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and XLG +6.4%.
- Which is cheaper, PDBC or XLG?
- XLG is cheaper, by 0.39 percentage points a year. That is about $39 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PDBC against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-xlg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PDBC against XLG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-xlg
[PDBC against XLG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-xlg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.