Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs SPHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to SPHQ's +14.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and SPHQ

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and $18.7bn for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
+14.1%
SPHQ total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.15%
SPHQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPHQ costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 41.5 points; SPHQ is 2.3 times larger.

PDBC vs SPHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCSPHQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%+14.1%
Drawdown
Below its high6.4%, high on Jun 30, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Quality Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$8.0bn$18.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund43.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and SPHQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC SPHQ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in SPHQ
Mastercard Inc 6.25%
Visa Inc 6.23%
Apple Inc 5.96%
Costco Wholesale Corp 4.24%
GE Vernova Inc 3.81%
Cisco Systems Inc 3.65%
General Electric Co 3.33%
Lam Research Corp 3.32%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year +55.6% +14.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC +0.4 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.15%
Holdings 1 102
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.0bn $18.7bn

PDBC and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC and SPHQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

SPHQ

SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 43.3%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or SPHQ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and SPHQ +14.1%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or SPHQ?
SPHQ is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against SPHQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-sphq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.