Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
PDBC vs SPHQ: how they differ
PDBC and SPHQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned more over the year.
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and SPHQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in PDBC | Only in SPHQ |
|---|---|
| Invesco Premier US Government Money Port 75.58% | Mastercard Inc 5.78% |
| POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 24.42% | Visa Inc 5.68% |
| Apple Inc 5.60% | |
| Lam Research Corp 4.10% | |
| Netflix Inc 4.00% | |
| GE Vernova Inc 3.92% | |
| Costco Wholesale Corp 3.85% | |
| General Electric Co 3.62% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | Invesco |
| What it is | Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy | S&P 500 Quality |
| Total return, 1 year | +55.2% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +37.7 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| Holdings | 2 | 100 |
PDBC in plain words
PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
SPHQ in plain words
SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 43.4%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or SPHQ?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.2% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, PDBC or SPHQ?
- PDBC charges 0.59% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do PDBC and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of PDBC and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PDBC against SPHQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-sphq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources