Which returned more over the last year, SLV or XLG?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SLV returned +14.9% and XLG +6.4%.

Which is cheaper, SLV or XLG?

XLG is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

SLV vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

SLV is a commodity fund and XLG an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SLV returned +14.9% against +6.4%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SLV and XLG

Net assets: $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Silver Trust, and $11.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

SLV on its own →XLG on its own →

At a glance

+14.9%

SLV total return, 1 year

+6.4%

XLG total return, 1 year

0.50%

SLV expense ratio

0.20%

XLG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLG costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.5 points; SLV is 2.2 times larger.

SLV vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	SLV	XLG
Return
Measure	SLV	XLG
Total return, 1 year	+14.9%	+6.4%
Drawdown
Measure	SLV	XLG
Below its high	53.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	SLV	XLG
What it tracks	Silver	S&P 500 Top 50 Index
Cost and size
Measure	SLV	XLG
Expense ratio	0.50%	0.20%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$26.5bn	$11.9bn
Holdings
Measure	SLV	XLG
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		98%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		60.3%

Method

Side by side

SLV iShares Silver Trust XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares Invesco

What it is Holds silver Tracks the S&P 500 top 50

Total return, 1 year +14.9% +6.4%

Its benchmark over the same days +15.0% (SIVR) +13.7% (IVV)

Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SIVR −7.3 pts vs IVV

Expense ratio 0.50% 0.20%

Holdings not counted 53

Net assets, SLV as of Oct 28, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026 $26.9bn $11.9bn

SLV and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

SLV

Its expense ratio is 0.50% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

SLV holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SLV or XLG?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SLV returned +14.9% and XLG +6.4%.
Which is cheaper, SLV or XLG?: XLG is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

AVUS vs SLV DGRW vs SLV MTUM vs SLV SLV vs SPHQ GLDM vs XLG IAU vs XLG GLD vs XLG BWET vs XLG

Where to next

SLV on its own →XLG on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →XLG dividend history →XLG holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

iShares page for SLV ↗

XLG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XLG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Invesco page for XLG ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SLV against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/slv-vs-xlg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.