Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MTUM vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM returned +18.4% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MTUM and PDBC
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
Pair scorecard
MTUM costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 37.2 points; MTUM is 2.3 times larger.
| Measure | MTUM | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.4% | +55.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $18.7bn | $8.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 93% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MTUM and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or PDBC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and PDBC +55.6%.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or PDBC?
- MTUM is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MTUM against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-pdbc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MTUM against PDBC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-pdbc
[MTUM against PDBC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-pdbc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.