Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HGER vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HGER returned +46.9% to MTUM's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HGER and MTUM

Net assets: $5.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF, and $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

At a glance
+46.9%
HGER total return, 1 year
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
0.68%
HGER expense ratio
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MTUM costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.5 points; MTUM is 3.7 times larger.

HGER vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHGERMTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year+46.9%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksQuantix Commodity IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.0bn$18.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HGER MTUM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HGER
Only in MTUM
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year +46.9% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +4.8 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 93.2%
Holdings 0 126
Net assets, HGER as of Oct 28, 2026 and MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.0bn $18.7bn

HGER and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HGER and MTUM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or MTUM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +46.9% and MTUM +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, HGER or MTUM?
MTUM is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HGER and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of HGER and 93% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HGER against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-mtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.