Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or RSPA?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.8% and RSPA +12.6%.

Which is cheaper, NOBL or RSPA?

RSPA is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $6. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do NOBL and RSPA overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 100% of NOBL and 74% of RSPA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Share on X Download as PDF Ask about these two funds

NOBL vs RSPA: how they differ

NOBL and RSPA hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and RSPA returned +12.6% over the year. ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF.

RSPA costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points; NOBL is 9.2 times larger.

	NOBL	RSPA
Expense ratio	0.35%	0.29%
Net assets	$11.2bn	$1.2bn
Total return, 1 year	+9.8%	+12.6%
Holdings in common	10%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year	+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	16.7%	4.2%
Below its high	6.3%, high on Aug 24, 2026	3.2%, high on Aug 26, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+9.8%

NOBL total return, 1 year

+12.6%

RSPA total return, 1 year

0.35%

NOBL expense ratio

0.29%

RSPA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and RSPA hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

50%

half

10% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding NOBL RSPA

ABBVIE INC 1.62% 0.16%

WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES 1.51% 0.16%

EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.71% 0.16%

PROCTER & GAMBLE CO/THE 1.50% 0.16%

NORDSON CORP 1.67% 0.16%

WALMART INC 1.51% 0.16%

ECOLAB INC 1.56% 0.16%

FASTENAL CO 1.66% 0.16%

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO INC 1.49% 0.15%

EXPEDITORS INTL WASH INC 1.61% 0.15%

LINDE PLC 1.41% 0.15%

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.65% 0.15%

Only in NOBL

BROWN-FORMAN CORP-CLASS B 1.48%

Only in RSPA

Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 0.61%

Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 0.55%

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 0.43%

Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 0.43%

Royal Bank of Canada 0.42%

Wells Fargo & Co 0.39%

JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.36%

Barclays Bank PLC 0.36%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

RSPA

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer ProShares Invesco

What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +9.8% +12.6%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 −7.4 pts −4.7 pts

Expense ratio 0.35% 0.29%

Already in the S&P 500 99.7% 74.0%

Holdings 69 520

Net assets $11.2bn $1.2bn

NOBL and RSPA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

RSPA in plain words

RSPA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 520 positions, with the top ten at 4.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or RSPA?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.8% and RSPA +12.6%.
Which is cheaper, NOBL or RSPA?: RSPA is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $6. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do NOBL and RSPA overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 100% of NOBL and 74% of RSPA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

DVY vs NOBL NOBL vs VOE NOBL vs RWK IMCV vs NOBL RSPA vs VFLO FVD vs RSPA COWZ vs RSPA DVY vs RSPA

NOBL on its own →RSPA on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

NOBL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗NOBL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for NOBL ↗RSPA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗RSPA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for RSPA ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, NOBL against RSPA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nobl-vs-rspa

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.