A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

IMCV vs NOBL: how they differ

IMCV and NOBL hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and IMCV returned +20.8% over the year. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

IMCV costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.0 points; NOBL is 9.8 times larger.

IMCVNOBL
Expense ratio0.06%0.35%
Net assets$1.1bn$11.2bn
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+9.8%
Holdings in common14%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund13.6%16.7%
Below its high3.7%, high on Aug 24, 20266.3%, high on Aug 24, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+20.8%
IMCV total return, 1 year
+9.8%
NOBL total return, 1 year
0.06%
IMCV expense ratio
0.35%
NOBL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IMCV and NOBL hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

14% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IMCV NOBL
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC 1.55% 1.65%
TARGET CORP 1.01% 1.65%
AFLAC 0.74% 1.37%
BECTON DICKINSON 0.72% 1.78%
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE 0.67% 1.43%
CONSOLIDATED EDISON 0.56% 1.40%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND 0.54% 1.35%
SYSCO 0.54% 1.41%
ILLINOIS TOOL INC 0.52% 1.43%
EMERSON ELECTRIC 0.50% 1.71%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS 0.48% 1.40%
REALTY INCOME REIT 0.48% 1.23%
Only in IMCV
VALERO ENERGY CORP 1.84%
PHILLIPS 66 1.62%
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 1.36%
US BANCORP 1.28%
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP 1.26%
3M 1.22%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC 1.21%
EOG RESOURCES 1.12%
Only in NOBL
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.73%
NORDSON CORP 1.67%
FASTENAL CO 1.66%
CHEVRON CORP 1.63%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.63%
ABBVIE INC 1.62%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.62%
MEDTRONIC PLC 1.60%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares ProShares
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year +20.8% +9.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +3.6 pts −7.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.06% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 92.3% 99.7%
Holdings 270 69
Net assets $1.1bn $11.2bn

IMCV and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IMCV in plain words

IMCV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 270 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IMCV or NOBL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IMCV returned +20.8% and NOBL +9.8%.
Which is cheaper, IMCV or NOBL?
IMCV is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $29. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IMCV and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IMCV and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
IMCV vs IWSIMCV vs VFLOCOWZ vs IMCVIMCV vs SDYIVOV vs NOBLFTXR vs NOBLNOBL vs RPVNOBL vs REGL
IMCV on its own →NOBL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
IMCV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IMCV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IMCV ↗NOBL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗NOBL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for NOBL ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, IMCV against NOBL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imcv-vs-nobl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.