Which returned more over the last year, ILCV or NOBL?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILCV returned +22.0% and NOBL +9.8%.

Which is cheaper, ILCV or NOBL?

ILCV is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $31. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do ILCV and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 96% of ILCV and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

ILCV vs NOBL: how they differ

ILCV and NOBL hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and ILCV returned +22.0% over the year. iShares Morningstar Value ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

ILCV costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.2 points; NOBL is 8.2 times larger.

	ILCV	NOBL
Expense ratio	0.04%	0.35%
Net assets	$1.4bn	$11.2bn
Total return, 1 year	+22.0%	+9.8%
Holdings in common	16%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year	+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	35.8%	16.7%
Below its high		6.3%, high on Aug 24, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+22.0%

ILCV total return, 1 year

+9.8%

NOBL total return, 1 year

0.04%

ILCV expense ratio

0.35%

NOBL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ILCV and NOBL hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

50%

half

16% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding ILCV NOBL

EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.02% 1.62%

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.80% 1.51%

ABBVIE 1.40% 1.62%

CHEVRON 1.15% 1.63%

PROCTER & GAMBLE 1.02% 1.50%

COCA-COLA 1.00% 1.59%

WALMART 0.85% 1.51%

LINDE PLC 0.65% 1.41%

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 0.62% 1.63%

PEPSICO 0.51% 1.37%

ABBOTT LABORATORIES 0.50% 1.47%

MCDONALDS CORP 0.49% 1.32%

Only in ILCV

MICROSOFT 8.53%

APPLE 7.23%

AMAZON.COM INC 3.29%

META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.95%

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.75%

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.57%

ALPHABET CLASS A 2.56%

ALPHABET CLASS C 2.06%

Only in NOBL

FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.73%

NORDSON CORP 1.67%

FASTENAL CO 1.66%

ECOLAB INC 1.56%

ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.56%

WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES 1.51%

JM SMUCKER CO/THE 1.50%

CINTAS CORP 1.49%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ILCV

iShares Morningstar Value ETF

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares ProShares

What it is Tracks an index Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats

Total return, 1 year +22.0% +9.8%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +4.8 pts −7.4 pts

Expense ratio 0.04% 0.35%

Already in the S&P 500 96.0% 99.7%

Holdings 374 69

Net assets $1.4bn $11.2bn

ILCV and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ILCV in plain words

ILCV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 35.8%.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILCV or NOBL?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILCV returned +22.0% and NOBL +9.8%.
Which is cheaper, ILCV or NOBL?: ILCV is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $31. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ILCV and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 96% of ILCV and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

ILCV vs IWS ILCV vs MDYV ILCV vs SMIG ILCV vs SDOG NOBL vs SDOG NOBL vs RWK NOBL vs SMIG NOBL vs RSPA

ILCV on its own →NOBL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ILCV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ILCV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for ILCV ↗NOBL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗NOBL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for NOBL ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ILCV against NOBL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcv-vs-nobl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.