ILCV vs IWS: how they differ

ILCV and IWS hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and ILCV returned +22.0% over the year. iShares Morningstar Value ETF and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF.

ILCV costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points; IWS is 11.3 times larger.

ILCVIWS
Expense ratio0.04%0.23%
Net assets$1.4bn$15.3bn
Total return, 1 year+22.0%+20.2%
Holdings in common13%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.8%7.0%
Below its high4.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+22.0%
ILCV total return, 1 year
+20.2%
IWS total return, 1 year
0.04%
ILCV expense ratio
0.23%
IWS expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ILCV and IWS hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

13% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ILCV IWS
PHILLIPS 66 0.33% 1.06%
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 0.27% 0.94%
MARATHON PETROLEUM 0.20% 0.67%
MODERNA 0.20% 0.72%
KINDER MORGAN 0.18% 0.63%
CHENIERE ENERGY 0.17% 0.54%
DELTA AIR LINES 0.16% 0.47%
DEVON ENERGY 0.16% 0.55%
ONEOK 0.16% 0.57%
BECTON DICKINSON 0.14% 0.50%
FORD MOTOR CO 0.14% 0.48%
PAYPAL HOLDINGS 0.14% 0.47%
Only in ILCV
MICROSOFT 8.53%
APPLE 7.23%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.29%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.95%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.75%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.57%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.56%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.06%
Only in IWS
AMETEK INC 0.57%
BAKER HUGHES CLASS A 0.56%
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES 0.48%
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIE 0.47%
COHERENT 0.45%
FLEX LTD 0.42%
VEEVA SYSTEMS CLASS A 0.42%
VENTAS REIT 0.42%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +22.0% +20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +4.8 pts +3.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.23%
Already in the S&P 500 96.0% 66.1%
Holdings 374 719
Net assets $1.4bn $15.3bn

ILCV and IWS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ILCV in plain words

ILCV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 35.8%.

IWS in plain words

IWS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 66% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 719 positions, with the top ten at 7.0%. It sat 4.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILCV or IWS?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILCV returned +22.0% and IWS +20.2%.
Which is cheaper, ILCV or IWS?
ILCV is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $19. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ILCV and IWS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of ILCV and 66% of IWS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ILCV against IWS, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcv-vs-iws

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.