IWS vs RSPA: how they differ
IWS and RSPA hold 37% of their weight in the same names, and IWS returned +20.2% over the year. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF.
IWS costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.6 points; IWS is 12.6 times larger.
| IWS | RSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.23% | 0.29% |
| Net assets | $15.3bn | $1.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | +12.6% |
| Holdings in common | 37% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 7.0% | 4.2% |
| Below its high | 4.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 3.2%, high on Aug 26, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWS and RSPA hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
37% in common
On the same fields
IWS and RSPA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWS in plain words
IWS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 66% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 719 positions, with the top ten at 7.0%. It sat 4.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
RSPA in plain words
RSPA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 520 positions, with the top ten at 4.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWS or RSPA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWS returned +20.2% and RSPA +12.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IWS or RSPA?
- IWS is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $6. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, IWS against RSPA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iws-vs-rspa
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IWS against RSPA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iws-vs-rspa
[IWS against RSPA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iws-vs-rspa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.