KLMN vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
KLMN and SCHX hold 80% of their weight in the same names, and KLMN returned +20.5% over the year. Net assets: $2.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF, and $72.6bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.
SCHX costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; SCHX is far larger, $72.6bn against $2.3bn.
| KLMN | SCHX | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of May 31, 2026 | $2.3bn | $72.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.5% | +19.8% |
| What it tracks | MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index |
| Holdings in common | 80% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 10, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.5% | 37.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KLMN and SCHX hold 80% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
80% in common
On the same fields
KLMN and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About KLMN
KLMN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 12, 2026 it returned +20.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 274 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.
About SCHX
SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 12, 2026 it returned +19.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, KLMN or SCHX?
- In the year to Oct 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KLMN returned +20.5% and SCHX +19.8%.
- Which is cheaper, KLMN or SCHX?
- SCHX is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KLMN against SCHX, data as of Oct 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmn-vs-schx
ETFIQ. (Oct 12, 2026). KLMN against SCHX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmn-vs-schx
[KLMN against SCHX (ETFIQ, Oct 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmn-vs-schx)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.