IWV vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWV and SCHX hold 83% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $20.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 3000 ETF, and $72.6bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

SCHX costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; SCHX is 3.4 times larger.

IWV vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWVSCHX
Expense ratio0.20%0.03%
Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025$15.5bn$52.6bn
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+16.6%
What it tracksRussell 3000 IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index
Holdings in common83%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.7%37.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
+16.6%
SCHX total return, 1 year
0.20%
IWV expense ratio
0.03%
SCHX expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWV and SCHX hold 83% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

83% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWV SCHX
NVIDIA 7.15% 7.50%
APPLE 6.51% 6.69%
MICROSOFT 5.32% 4.88%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.40% 3.87%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.74% 3.23%
BROADCOM INC 2.25% 3.10%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21% 2.57%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.11% 2.02%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.55% 1.60%
TESLA INC 1.49% 1.79%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28% 1.27%
ELI LILLY 1.26% 1.28%
Only in IWV
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.93%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.54%
GE AEROSPACE 0.43%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 0.35%
SANDISK 0.31%
MCDONALDS CORP 0.22%
TJX 0.20%
PROLOGIS REIT 0.16%
Only in SCHX
Exxon Mobil Corp 0.89%
Applied Materials Inc 0.52%
General Electric Co 0.50%
Texas Instruments Inc 0.41%
McDonald's Corp 0.29%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.28%
TJX Cos Inc/The 0.25%
Prologis Inc 0.20%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +16.7% +16.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VTHR) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTHR not available
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 94.5%
Holdings 2600 748
Net assets, IWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and SCHX as of May 31, 2026 $20.6bn $72.6bn

IWV and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

About SCHX

SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWV or SCHX?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWV returned +16.7% and SCHX +16.6%.
Which is cheaper, IWV or SCHX?
SCHX is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWV and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of IWV and 94% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWV against SCHX, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwv-vs-schx

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.