A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

IWV vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWV and MTUM hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned +25.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $20.6bn for iShares Russell 3000 ETF and $20.3bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

MTUM costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.1 points.

IWV vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWVMTUM
Expense ratio0.20%0.15%
Net assets$20.6bn$20.3bn
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+25.8%
What it tracksRussell 3000 IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Holdings in common26%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.7%36.1%
Below its high7.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
+25.8%
MTUM total return, 1 year
0.20%
IWV expense ratio
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWV and MTUM hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

26% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWV MTUM
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.74% 2.69%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21% 2.12%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.55% 5.19%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.32% 6.16%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.93% 2.60%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.84% 3.14%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.64% 4.09%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.63% 3.63%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.54% 3.03%
CHEVRON 0.53% 1.43%
LAM RESEARCH 0.53% 2.34%
CATERPILLAR INC 0.49% 2.02%
Only in IWV
NVIDIA 7.15%
APPLE 6.51%
MICROSOFT 5.32%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.40%
BROADCOM INC 2.25%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.11%
TESLA INC 1.49%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28%
Only in MTUM
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 2.02%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares iShares
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year +16.7% +25.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VTHR) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTHR not available
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 93.2%
Holdings 2600 126
Net assets $20.6bn $20.3bn

IWV and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

About MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWV or MTUM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWV returned +16.7% and MTUM +25.8%.
Which is cheaper, IWV or MTUM?
MTUM is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWV and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of IWV and 93% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
IWV vs OEFIWV vs SPHQIWV vs SPMOIWV vs USMVMTUM vs PBUSMTUM vs THROMTUM vs RECSMTUM vs SCHK
IWV on its own →MTUM on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
IWV and MTUM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IWV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IWV ↗MTUM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for MTUM ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWV against MTUM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwv-vs-mtum

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.