IWL vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWL and SCHX hold 77% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $2.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF, and $72.6bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

SCHX costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; SCHX is far larger, $52.6bn against $1.7bn.

IWL vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWLSCHX
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025$1.7bn$52.6bn
Total return, 1 year+16.8%+16.6%
What it tracksRussell Top 200 IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index
Holdings in common77%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund44.6%37.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.8%
IWL total return, 1 year
+16.6%
SCHX total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWL expense ratio
0.03%
SCHX expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWL and SCHX hold 77% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

77% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWL SCHX
NVIDIA 9.18% 7.50%
APPLE 8.35% 6.69%
MICROSOFT 6.82% 4.88%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.37% 3.87%
ALPHABET CLASS A 3.52% 3.23%
BROADCOM INC 2.89% 3.10%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.84% 2.57%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.71% 2.02%
TESLA INC 1.92% 1.79%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.99% 1.60%
ELI LILLY 1.62% 1.28%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.65% 1.27%
Only in IWL
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.19%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.69%
GE AEROSPACE 0.55%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 0.44%
SANDISK 0.40%
MCDONALDS CORP 0.29%
TJX 0.26%
PROLOGIS REIT 0.21%
Only in SCHX
Exxon Mobil Corp 0.89%
Applied Materials Inc 0.52%
General Electric Co 0.50%
Texas Instruments Inc 0.41%
McDonald's Corp 0.29%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.28%
TJX Cos Inc/The 0.25%
Prologis Inc 0.20%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWL
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +16.8% +16.6%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 99.2% 94.5%
Holdings 202 748
Net assets, IWL as of Oct 9, 2026 and SCHX as of May 31, 2026 $2.3bn $72.6bn

IWL and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWL

IWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 202 positions, with the top ten at 44.6%.

About SCHX

SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWL or SCHX?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWL returned +16.8% and SCHX +16.6%.
Which is cheaper, IWL or SCHX?
SCHX is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWL and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of IWL and 94% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWL against SCHX, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwl-vs-schx

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.