A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

IWF vs TCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWF and TCHP hold 67% of their weight in the same names, and IWF returned +4.0% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $125.0bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and $2.2bn for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about IWF and TCHP

Answers cite the figures on this page.

IWF costs 0.39 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points; IWF is far larger, $125.0bn against $2.2bn.

IWF vs TCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWFTCHP
Expense ratio0.18%0.57%
Net assets$125.0bn$2.2bn
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+2.4%
What it tracksRussell 1000 Growth IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common67%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.8%56.7%
Below its high5.2%, high on Oct 6, 20265.1%, high on Jun 1, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.

+4.0%
IWF total return, 1 year
+2.4%
TCHP total return, 1 year
0.18%
IWF expense ratio
0.57%
TCHP expense ratio

Get IWF and TCHP fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWF and TCHP hold 67% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.

half

67% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWF TCHP
NVIDIA 15.20% 15.95%
ALPHABET CLASS A 6.02% 5.85%
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.86% 6.31%
BROADCOM INC 4.67% 5.96%
APPLE 8.06% 4.54%
MICROSOFT 5.95% 4.38%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.81% 3.51%
ELI LILLY 2.97% 3.20%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.63% 3.64%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.06% 2.62%
TESLA INC 3.23% 2.61%
VISA CLASS A 2.05% 2.45%
Only in IWF
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.98%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 0.84%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 0.75%
GE VERNOVA 0.73%
HOME DEPOT 0.69%
KLA 0.65%
SANDISK 0.60%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.59%
Only in TCHP
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 2.50%
ASML HOLDING NV NY 1.61%
GE VERNOVA LLC 1.11%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR-SP ADR 1.06%
CHUBB LTD 0.98%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 0.85%
SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A 0.68%
T-MOBILE US INC 0.58%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
TCHP
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares T. Rowe Price
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 growth Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +2.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +4.1% (VONG) +4.0% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VONG −1.5 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.57%
Already in the S&P 500 93.5% 95.2%
Holdings 373 66
Net assets $125.0bn $2.2bn

IWF and TCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested, against +4.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.8%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.

About TCHP

TCHP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 56.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWF or TCHP?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +4.0% and TCHP +2.4%.
Which is cheaper, IWF or TCHP?
IWF is cheaper, by 0.39 percentage points a year. That is about $39 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWF and TCHP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 95% of TCHP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
IWF vs QGROIWF vs NUGOIWF vs PABUIWF vs QQEWQQQM vs TCHPTCHP vs VUGSCHG vs TCHPSPYG vs TCHP
IWF on its own →TCHP on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →IWF dividend history →IWF holdings →TCHP holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
IWF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IWF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IWF ↗TCHP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗TCHP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗T. Rowe Price website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWF against TCHP, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-tchp

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.