IWF vs TGRT: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWF and TGRT hold 63% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $125.0bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and $1.6bn for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF.
IWF costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points; IWF is far larger, $125.0bn against $1.6bn.
| IWF | TGRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.38% |
| Net assets | $125.0bn | $1.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +4.5% |
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 63% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.8% | 53.1% |
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and TGRT hold 63% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
63% in common
On the same fields
IWF and TGRT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested, against +4.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.8%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About TGRT
TGRT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.5% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 94 positions, with the top ten at 53.1%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or TGRT?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +4.0% and TGRT +4.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or TGRT?
- IWF is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against TGRT, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-tgrt
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IWF against TGRT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-tgrt
[IWF against TGRT (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-tgrt)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.