IWY vs TGRT: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWY and TGRT hold 64% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $15.8bn for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF and $1.6bn for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF.
IWY costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; IWY is 9.8 times larger.
| IWY | TGRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.38% |
| Net assets | $15.8bn | $1.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.7% | +4.5% |
| What it tracks | Russell Top 200 Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 64% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 60.9% | 53.1% |
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWY and TGRT hold 64% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
64% in common
On the same fields
IWY and TGRT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IWY
IWY tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
About TGRT
TGRT is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 94 positions, with the top ten at 53.1%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.5% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWY or TGRT?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWY returned +4.7% and TGRT +4.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IWY or TGRT?
- IWY is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWY against TGRT, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwy-vs-tgrt
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IWY against TGRT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwy-vs-tgrt
[IWY against TGRT (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwy-vs-tgrt)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.