Which returned more over the last year, IWY or TCHP?

In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWY returned +4.7% and TCHP +2.4%.

Which is cheaper, IWY or TCHP?

IWY is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do IWY and TCHP overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 99% of IWY and 95% of TCHP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

IWY vs TCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWY and TCHP hold 69% of their weight in the same names, and IWY returned +4.7% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $15.8bn for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF and $2.2bn for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about IWY and TCHP

Answers cite the figures on this page.

IWY costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points; IWY is 7.4 times larger.

IWY vs TCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
	IWY	TCHP
Expense ratio	0.20%	0.57%
Net assets	$15.8bn	$2.2bn
Total return, 1 year	+4.7%	+2.4%
What it tracks	Russell Top 200 Growth Index	No index, actively managed
Holdings in common	69%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	60.9%	56.7%
Below its high	5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026	5.1%, high on Jun 1, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.

+4.7%

IWY total return, 1 year

+2.4%

TCHP total return, 1 year

0.20%

IWY expense ratio

0.57%

TCHP expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWY and TCHP hold 69% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.

50%

half

69% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding IWY TCHP

NVIDIA 15.02% 15.95%

ALPHABET CLASS A 6.07% 5.85%

BROADCOM INC 5.08% 5.96%

ALPHABET CLASS C 4.89% 6.31%

APPLE 8.32% 4.54%

MICROSOFT 6.34% 4.38%

META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.35% 3.51%

ELI LILLY 3.55% 3.20%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.10% 3.64%

MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.54% 2.62%

TESLA INC 3.78% 2.61%

VISA CLASS A 2.51% 2.45%

Only in IWY

APPLIED MATERIAL INC 1.20%

PALO ALTO NETWORKS 1.03%

TEXAS INSTRUMENT 0.92%

GE VERNOVA 0.90%

HOME DEPOT 0.84%

KLA 0.80%

SANDISK 0.73%

AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.72%

Only in TCHP

APPLIED MATERIALS INC 2.50%

ASML HOLDING NV NY 1.61%

GE VERNOVA LLC 1.11%

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR-SP ADR 1.06%

CHUBB LTD 0.98%

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 0.85%

SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A 0.68%

T-MOBILE US INC 0.58%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWY

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF

TCHP

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares T. Rowe Price

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +4.7% +2.4%

Its benchmark over the same days +15.0% (IWV) +4.0% (IWF)

Gap to its benchmark −10.4 pts vs IWV −1.5 pts vs IWF

Expense ratio 0.20% 0.57%

Already in the S&P 500 98.8% 95.2%

Holdings 102 66

Net assets $15.8bn $2.2bn

IWY and TCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWY

IWY tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.

Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

About TCHP

TCHP is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 56.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.

Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWY or TCHP?: In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWY returned +4.7% and TCHP +2.4%.
Which is cheaper, IWY or TCHP?: IWY is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWY and TCHP overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 99% of IWY and 95% of TCHP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

IWY vs QGRO IWY vs NUGO IWY vs PABU IWY vs QQEW ONEQ vs TCHP JGRO vs TCHP TCHP vs VOOG MGK vs TCHP

IWY on its own →TCHP on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →IWY dividend history →IWY holdings →TCHP holdings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

IWY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IWY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IWY ↗TCHP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗TCHP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗T. Rowe Price website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWY against TCHP, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwy-vs-tchp

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.