Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
TGRT vs XOVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TGRT returned +0.6% to XOVR's −3.0%; 25% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about TGRT and XOVR
Net assets: $1.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF, and $2.2bn on Jun 30, 2026 for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
Pair scorecard
TGRT costs 1.43 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.6 points.
| Measure | TGRT | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.6% | −3.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 6.5%, high on Oct 5, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.38% | 1.81% |
| Net assets, TGRT as of Oct 27, 2026 and XOVR as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.6bn | $2.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 25% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 53.1% | 63.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, TGRT and XOVR hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
25% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
TGRT and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TGRT and XOVR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 25% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 TGRT returned +0.6% and XOVR −3.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.6 points.
- Cost. TGRT charges 0.38% of assets a year and XOVR 1.81%, a gap of 1.43 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.6% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
TGRT is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 94 positions, with the top ten at 53.1%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XOVR
XOVR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.81% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, TGRT or XOVR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TGRT returned +0.6% and XOVR −3.0%.
- Which is cheaper, TGRT or XOVR?
- TGRT is cheaper, by 1.43 percentage points a year. That is about $143 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, TGRT against XOVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tgrt-vs-xovr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). TGRT against XOVR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tgrt-vs-xovr
[TGRT against XOVR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tgrt-vs-xovr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.