IWB vs IYZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWB and IYZ hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IYZ returned +31.6% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $1.1bn for iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF.
IWB costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.0 points; IWB is far larger, $49.6bn against $1.1bn.
| IWB | IYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.37% |
| Net assets | $49.6bn | $1.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.6% | +31.6% |
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | Russell 1000 Telecommunications RIC 22 |
| Holdings in common | 2% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 71.3% |
| Below its high | 6.4%, high on Jun 2, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and IYZ hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
2% in common
On the same fields
IWB and IYZ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
About IYZ
IYZ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 71% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 71.3%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or IYZ?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and IYZ +31.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or IYZ?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against IYZ, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-iyz
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IWB against IYZ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-iyz
[IWB against IYZ (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-iyz)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.