IGF vs SCHG: how they differ
Over the year IGF returned +5.3% to SCHG's +13.5%, and SCHG charges 0.04% to IGF's 0.37%. iShares Global Infrastructure ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
SCHG costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points; SCHG is 5.9 times larger.
| IGF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, IGF as of Oct 8, 2026 and SCHG as of May 31, 2026 | $10.3bn | $61.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.3% | +13.5% |
| What it tracks | Infrastructure | not published |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 11.9 pts | |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 98% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 38% | 57.2% |
| Below its all-time high | 8.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IGF and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
IGF and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGF in plain words
By weight, 32% of IGF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 78 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.3% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.9 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Are IGF and SCHG in the same category?
- IGF is a thematic ETF and SCHG is a stock ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each holds.
- Which returned more over the last year, IGF or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGF returned +5.3% and SCHG +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IGF or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $33. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, IGF against SCHG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igf-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IGF against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igf-vs-schg
[IGF against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igf-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.