IGF vs QQQM: how they differ
Over the year IGF returned +5.3% to QQQM's +23.6%, and QQQM charges 0.15% to IGF's 0.37%. iShares Global Infrastructure ETF and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.
QQQM costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.3 points; QQQM is 10.8 times larger.
| IGF | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $10.3bn | $111.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.3% | +23.6% |
| What it tracks | Infrastructure | not published |
| Holdings in common | 2% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 11.9 pts | |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 98% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 38% | 46.9% |
| Below its all-time high | 8.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IGF and QQQM hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
2% in common
On the same fields
IGF and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGF in plain words
By weight, 32% of IGF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 78 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.3% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.9 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
QQQM in plain words
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 104 positions, with the top ten at 46.9%.
Questions people ask
- Are IGF and QQQM in the same category?
- IGF is a thematic ETF and QQQM is a stock ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each holds.
- Which returned more over the last year, IGF or QQQM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGF returned +5.3% and QQQM +23.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IGF or QQQM?
- QQQM is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $22. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, IGF against QQQM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igf-vs-qqqm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IGF against QQQM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igf-vs-qqqm
[IGF against QQQM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igf-vs-qqqm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.