Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BOTZ vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOTZ returned −10.2% to QQQM's +15.2%, and QQQM charges 0.15% to BOTZ's 0.68%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BOTZ and QQQM
Net assets: $3.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF, and $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.
Pair scorecard
QQQM costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.4 points; QQQM is far larger, $111.8bn against $3.3bn.
| Measure | BOTZ | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −10.2% | +15.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 18.2%, high on May 13, 2026 | |
| Below its high | 4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Robotics and automation | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $3.3bn | $111.8bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 88% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 13% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59% | 46.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returnsQQQM returned more: +157.2% to +15.4%. QQQM swung less: 21.0% to 26.4%. QQQM fell less at its worst: −35.0% to −55.4%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BOTZ | QQQM | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +15.4% | +157.2% | QQQM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.4% | +17.0% | QQQM | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +13.7% | +147.9% | QQQM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 26.4% | 21.0% | QQQM | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 18.5% | 13.6% | QQQM | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −55.4% | −35.0% | QQQM | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.10 | 0.70 | QQQM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.14 | 1.07 | QQQM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.04 | 0.49 | QQQM | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and QQQM hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
13% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BOTZ and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 149 days apart.
BOTZ
By weight, 19% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −10.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 18.2% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.
QQQM
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are BOTZ and QQQM in the same category?
- BOTZ is a thematic ETF and QQQM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, BOTZ or QQQM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOTZ returned −10.2% and QQQM +15.2%.
- Which is cheaper, BOTZ or QQQM?
- QQQM is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BOTZ against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/botz-vs-qqqm
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BOTZ against QQQM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/botz-vs-qqqm
[BOTZ against QQQM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/botz-vs-qqqm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.