Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
GDXJ vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GDXJ returned +14.8% to QQQM's +15.2%, and QQQM charges 0.15% to GDXJ's 0.52%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GDXJ and QQQM
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.6bn for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF and $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.
Pair scorecard
QQQM costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; QQQM is 14.5 times larger.
| Measure | GDXJ | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +15.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 33.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | |
| Below its high | 4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Gold miners | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 1.4 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $7.6bn | $110.4bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 41% | 46.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GDXJ and QQQM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
GDXJ and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GDXJ
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. It sits 33.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
QQQM
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are GDXJ and QQQM in the same category?
- GDXJ is a thematic ETF and QQQM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, GDXJ or QQQM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GDXJ returned +14.8% and QQQM +15.2%.
- Which is cheaper, GDXJ or QQQM?
- QQQM is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GDXJ against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gdxj-vs-qqqm
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). GDXJ against QQQM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gdxj-vs-qqqm
[GDXJ against QQQM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gdxj-vs-qqqm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.