Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COPX vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COPX returned +27.5% to QQQM's +15.2%, and QQQM charges 0.15% to COPX's 0.65%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COPX and QQQM

Net assets: $7.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Copper Miners ETF, and $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+27.5%
COPX total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.65%
COPX expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.3 points; QQQM is 15.3 times larger.

COPX vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOPXQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+27.5%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high20.3%, high on Aug 27, 2026
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksCopperNasdaq-100 Index
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 14.1 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$7.3bn$111.8bn
Active share vs the S&P 500100%
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund50%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returns
COPX QQQM
Return
Total return edge COPX +271.7% +157.2%
Annualized edge COPX +24.4% +17.0%
Price return edge COPX +225.7% +147.9%
Risk
Volatility edge QQQM 37.9% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge QQQM −41.0% −35.0%
Downside capture 136.2% 99.8%
Beta 1.64 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQM (slight) 0.68 0.70
Sortino edge QQQM (slight) 1.02 1.07
Treynor 0.068 0.147
Calmar edge COPX 0.59 0.49
Against the benchmark
Alpha −4.5% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.69 0.62
Information ratio 0.05 0.10
Tracking error 28.4% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: COPX against ACWI, Apr 30, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

COPX returned more: +271.7% to +157.2%. QQQM swung less: 21.0% to 37.9%. QQQM fell less at its worst: −35.0% to −41.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: COPX vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOPXQQQMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+271.7%+157.2%COPXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+24.4%+17.0%COPXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+225.7%+147.9%COPXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility37.9%21.0%QQQMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation25.2%13.6%QQQMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−41.0%−35.0%QQQMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture204.4%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture136.2%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.641.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.501.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.680.70QQQM (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.021.07QQQM (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0680.147Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.590.49COPXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWIQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−4.5% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.690.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−17.4% to +8.3%−0.2% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.050.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error28.4%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COPX and QQQM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COPX QQQM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COPX
BHP GROUP LIMITED 5.48%
Teck Resources Limited 5.39%
Hudbay Minerals Inc. 5.26%
SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION 5.08%
FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTD. 5.04%
GLENCORE PLC 5.02%
ANTOFAGASTA PLC 5.00%
KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 4.76%
Only in QQQM
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Thematic ETF Stock ETF
What it is Copper Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +27.5% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark +14.1 pts vs ACWI 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 4.8% 95.7%
Holdings 40 105
Net assets, COPX as of Oct 12, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.3bn $110.4bn

COPX and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E4B328DE5D

COPX and QQQM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. COPX follows Copper and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 COPX returned +27.5% and QQQM +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COPX

By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 40 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 14.1 pts. It sits 20.3% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are COPX and QQQM in the same category?
COPX is a thematic ETF and QQQM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, COPX or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COPX returned +27.5% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, COPX or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COPX and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 5% of COPX and 96% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COPX against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/copx-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.