Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COPX vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COPX returned +27.5% to SCHG's +6.8%, and SCHG charges 0.04% to COPX's 0.65%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COPX and SCHG
Net assets: $7.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Copper Miners ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.61 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.7 points.
| Measure | COPX | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +27.5% | +6.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 20.3%, high on Aug 27, 2026 | |
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Copper | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 14.1 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, COPX as of Oct 12, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 | $7.3bn | $63.0bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 50% | 51.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 30, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 860 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: COPX against ACWI, Apr 30, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.
SCHG returned more: +1,058.7% to +152.9%. SCHG swung less: 18.6% to 37.4%. SCHG fell less at its worst: −34.2% to −83.0%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | COPX | SCHG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +152.9% | +1,058.7% | SCHG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +5.8% | +16.0% | SCHG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +78.9% | +906.1% | SCHG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 37.4% | 18.6% | SCHG | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 25.3% | 12.5% | SCHG | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −83.0% | −34.2% | SCHG | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 204.4% | 121.1% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 136.2% | 108.1% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.64 | 1.10 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.50 | 0.92 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.30 | 0.81 | SCHG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.44 | 1.20 | SCHG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.068 | 0.138 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.07 | 0.47 | SCHG | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | ACWI | IVV | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −4.5% a year | +0.8% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.69 | 0.65 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −17.4% to +8.3% | −1.7% to +3.4% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.05 | 0.40 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 28.4% | 5.5% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 860 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COPX and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COPX and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COPX and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. COPX follows Copper and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 COPX returned +27.5% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 20.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
COPX
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 40 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 14.1 pts. It sits 20.3% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are COPX and SCHG in the same category?
- COPX is a thematic ETF and SCHG is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, COPX or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COPX returned +27.5% and SCHG +6.8%.
- Which is cheaper, COPX or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.61 percentage points a year. That is about $61 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COPX against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/copx-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COPX against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/copx-vs-schg
[COPX against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/copx-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.