Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IBB vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IBB returned +37.5% to TLT's −7.9%, and TLT charges 0.15% to IBB's 0.44%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IBB and TLTNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.0bn for iShares Biotechnology ETF and $47.4bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
TLT costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 45.4 points; TLT is 4.3 times larger.
| Measure | IBB | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +37.5% | −7.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Biotech | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.44% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $11.0bn | $47.4bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 40% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 50% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IBB and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IBB and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBB
By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +37.5% with distributions reinvested.
TLT
TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are IBB and TLT in the same category?
- IBB is a thematic ETF and TLT is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, IBB or TLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +37.5% and TLT −7.9%.
- Which is cheaper, IBB or TLT?
- TLT is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IBB against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-tlt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IBB against TLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-tlt
[IBB against TLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-tlt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.