Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
REMX vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, REMX returned −19.2% to TLT's −7.9%, and TLT charges 0.15% to REMX's 0.53%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about REMX and TLT
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.5bn for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF and $47.4bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
TLT costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.3 points; TLT is far larger, $47.4bn against $1.5bn.
| Measure | REMX | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −19.2% | −7.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 75.1%, high on Apr 11, 2011 | |
| Below its high | 42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Rare earth and critical materials | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 32.6 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.53% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.5bn | $47.4bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 61% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 5, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 833 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: REMX against ACWI, Nov 5, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; TLT against BBLB, Apr 28, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026.
TLT returned more: +31.7% to −68.2%. TLT swung less: 14.0% to 35.3%. TLT fell less at its worst: −47.8% to −89.2%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | REMX | TLT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | −68.2% | +31.7% | TLT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | −6.9% | +1.7% | TLT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −79.7% | −17.0% | TLT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 35.3% | 14.0% | TLT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 24.5% | 10.0% | TLT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −89.2% | −47.8% | TLT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 129.3% | 102.4% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 133.0% | 101.2% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.43 | 1.01 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.42 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.07 | 0.08 | TLT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.10 | 0.11 | TLT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | −0.018 | −0.072 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | −0.08 | 0.04 | TLT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | ACWI | BBLB | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −15.8% a year | 0.0% a year | TLT not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −2.33 | −0.01 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −29.0% to −2.5% | −0.8% to +0.8% | TLT includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.42 | −0.10 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 27.8% | 0.7% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 833 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, REMX and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
REMX and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
REMX and TLT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. REMX follows Rare earth and critical materials and TLT follows ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 REMX returned −19.2% and TLT −7.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
REMX
By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −19.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.6 pts. It sits 75.1% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.
TLT
TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are REMX and TLT in the same category?
- REMX is a thematic ETF and TLT is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, REMX or TLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REMX returned −19.2% and TLT −7.9%.
- Which is cheaper, REMX or TLT?
- TLT is cheaper, by 0.38 percentage points a year. That is about $38 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, REMX against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-tlt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). REMX against TLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-tlt
[REMX against TLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-tlt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.