Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GDX vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GDX returned +19.0% to TLT's −7.9%, and TLT charges 0.15% to GDX's 0.51%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GDX and TLT

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.6bn for VanEck Gold Miners ETF and $47.4bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+19.0%
GDX total return, 1 year
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.51%
GDX expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.9 points; TLT is 1.9 times larger.

GDX vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGDXTLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+19.0%−7.9%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high27.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGold minersICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 5.6 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.51%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.6bn$47.4bn
Active share vs the S&P 500100%
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight12%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 2, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,064 weekly returns
GDX TLT
Return
Total return edge GDX +148.2% +83.7%
Annualized edge GDX +4.5% +3.0%
Price return edge GDX +105.0% −4.1%
Risk
Volatility edge TLT 38.4% 14.0%
Max drawdown edge TLT −79.2% −47.8%
Downside capture 74.9% 101.2%
Beta 0.76 1.01
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GDX 0.27 0.16
Sortino edge GDX 0.38 0.23
Treynor 0.127 −0.072
Calmar edge TLT (slight) 0.06 0.06
Against the benchmark
Alpha +3.4% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.41 −0.01
Information ratio 0.04 −0.10
Tracking error 36.4% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: GDX against ACWI, Apr 4, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026; TLT against BBLB, Apr 28, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

GDX returned more: +148.2% to +83.7%. TLT swung less: 14.0% to 38.4%. TLT fell less at its worst: −47.8% to −79.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GDX vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGDXTLTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+148.2%+83.7%GDXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+4.5%+3.0%GDXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+105.0%−4.1%GDXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility38.4%14.0%TLTSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation26.4%9.8%TLTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−79.2%−47.8%TLTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture50.2%102.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture74.9%101.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.761.01Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.131.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.270.16GDXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.380.23GDXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.127−0.072Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.060.06TLT (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWIBBLBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+3.4% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.41−0.01Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−13.0% to +19.9%−0.8% to +0.8%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.04−0.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error36.4%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,064 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GDX and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GDX TLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GDX
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 11.45%
Newmont Corp 11.42%
Barrick Mining Corp 8.07%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 5.50%
Franco-Nevada Corp 5.33%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc 4.78%
Gold Fields Ltd 3.96%
Kinross Gold Corp 3.88%
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Thematic ETF Bond ETF
What it is Gold miners Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year +19.0% −7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) −7.8% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark +5.6 pts vs ACWI −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Expense ratio 0.51% 0.15%
Holdings 59 47
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $25.6bn $47.4bn

GDX and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-8765E83E3A

GDX and TLT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. GDX follows Gold miners and TLT follows ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 GDX returned +19.0% and TLT −7.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 26.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GDX and TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GDX

By weight, 12% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +19.0% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 5.6 pts. It sits 27.5% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are GDX and TLT in the same category?
GDX is a thematic ETF and TLT is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, GDX or TLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GDX returned +19.0% and TLT −7.9%.
Which is cheaper, GDX or TLT?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GDX against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gdx-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.