Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IBB vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IBB returned +37.5% to IWF's +0.9%, and IWF charges 0.18% to IBB's 0.44%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IBB and IWFNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.0bn for iShares Biotechnology ETF and $124.7bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWF costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 36.6 points; IWF is 11.3 times larger.
| Measure | IBB | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +37.5% | +0.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Biotech | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.44% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $11.0bn | $124.7bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 50% | 57.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IBB and IWF hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
1% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IBB and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBB
By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +37.5% with distributions reinvested.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are IBB and IWF in the same category?
- IBB is a thematic ETF and IWF is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, IBB or IWF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +37.5% and IWF +0.9%.
- Which is cheaper, IBB or IWF?
- IWF is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IBB against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-iwf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IBB against IWF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-iwf
[IBB against IWF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-iwf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.