Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWF vs LYTE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

IWF and LYTE are measured over different days, and IWF charges 0.18% to LYTE's 0.65%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWF and LYTE

Net assets: $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $165m on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF.

At a glance
+0.9%
IWF total return, 1 year
−19.6%
LYTE total return, since launch, Aug 6, 2026
0.18%
IWF expense ratio
0.65%
LYTE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWF costs 0.47 points a year less; IWF is far larger, $124.7bn against $163m.

IWF vs LYTE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWFLYTE
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.9%not published
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Below its all-time high28.5%, high on Aug 17, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Growth IndexPhotonics and optics
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.65%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$124.7bn$163m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.5%

Method

Side by side

IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Thematic ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 growth Photonics and optics
Total return, 1 year +0.9% −19.6% (since launch, Aug 6, 2026)
Its benchmark over the same days +1.1% (VONG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VONG not measured
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.65%
Holdings 374 not yet filed
Net assets, IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 and LYTE as of Oct 28, 2026 $124.7bn $165m

IWF and LYTE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWF and LYTE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

LYTE

LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it first traded on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −19.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 28.5% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are IWF and LYTE in the same category?
IWF is a stock ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which is cheaper, IWF or LYTE?
IWF is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWF against LYTE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-lyte

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.