Which returned more over the last year, IAU or XLV?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IAU returned +19.2% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IAU or XLV?

IAU charges 0.25% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IAU vs XLV: how they differ

IAU is a commodity fund and XLV an equity index fund, and over the year XLV returned more, +20.4% against +19.2%.

iShares Gold Trust and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

IAU and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IAU iShares Gold Trust	XLV State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	Gold	Health care
Total return, 1 year	+19.2%	+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.7 pts	+2.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.08%
Holdings	not filed	63

IAU in plain words

IAU is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 63 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IAU or XLV?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IAU returned +19.2% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IAU or XLV?: IAU charges 0.25% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IAU against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IAU against XLV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iau-vs-xlv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources