HYLS vs SJNK: Differences, Returns & Fees
HYLS's duration was 2.9 years on Jul 31, 2026 and SJNK's 2.3 on Jun 30, 2026; SJNK charges 0.40% to HYLS's 0.69%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $1.6bn for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF and $4.4bn for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF.
SJNK costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point; SJNK is 2.7 times larger.
| HYLS | SJNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.40% |
| Net assets | $1.6bn | $4.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.2% | +1.2% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
HYLS and SJNK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. HYLS follows No index, actively managed and SJNK follows Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index.
- Number of holdings. HYLS holds 332 positions and SJNK holds 1121.
- Cost. HYLS charges 0.69% of assets a year and SJNK 0.40%, a gap of 0.29 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
HYLS and SJNK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About HYLS
HYLS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +1.2% for its benchmark, the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.69% a year.
About SJNK
SJNK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.2% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYLS or SJNK?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYLS returned +0.2% and SJNK +1.2%.
- Which is cheaper, HYLS or SJNK?
- SJNK is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HYLS against SJNK, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyls-vs-sjnk
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). HYLS against SJNK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyls-vs-sjnk
[HYLS against SJNK (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyls-vs-sjnk)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.