HYLS vs JNK: Differences, Returns & Fees
HYLS's duration was 2.9 years on Jul 31, 2026 and JNK's 3.4 on Jun 30, 2026; JNK charges 0.40% to HYLS's 0.69%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $1.6bn for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF and $5.5bn for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.
JNK costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; JNK is 3.5 times larger.
| HYLS | JNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.40% |
| Net assets | $1.6bn | $5.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.2% | +1.1% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Below its high | 3.0%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | |
HYLS and JNK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. HYLS follows No index, actively managed and JNK follows Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index.
- Number of holdings. HYLS holds 332 positions and JNK holds 1141.
- Cost. HYLS charges 0.69% of assets a year and JNK 0.40%, a gap of 0.29 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
HYLS and JNK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About HYLS
HYLS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +1.2% for its benchmark, the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.69% a year.
About JNK
JNK tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYLS or JNK?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYLS returned +0.2% and JNK +1.1%.
- Which is cheaper, HYLS or JNK?
- JNK is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HYLS against JNK, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyls-vs-jnk
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). HYLS against JNK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyls-vs-jnk
[HYLS against JNK (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyls-vs-jnk)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.