HYGV vs HYLS: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jul 31, 2026 HYGV's duration was 3.0 years and HYLS's 2.9; HYGV charges 0.37% to HYLS's 0.69%. Net assets: $1.1bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored Bond ETF, and $1.6bn on Oct 20, 2026 for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF.
HYGV costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points; HYLS is 1.5 times larger.
| HYGV | HYLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.69% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $1.1bn | $1.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.0% | +0.2% |
| What it tracks | Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | |
HYGV and HYLS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. HYGV follows Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index and HYLS follows No index, actively managed.
- Number of holdings. HYGV holds 1,007 positions and HYLS holds 332.
- Cost. HYGV charges 0.37% of assets a year and HYLS 0.69%, a gap of 0.32 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
HYGV and HYLS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About HYGV
HYGV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About HYLS
HYLS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +1.2% for its benchmark, the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.69% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYGV or HYLS?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYGV returned +1.0% and HYLS +0.2%.
- Which is cheaper, HYGV or HYLS?
- HYGV is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HYGV against HYLS, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hygv-vs-hyls
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). HYGV against HYLS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hygv-vs-hyls
[HYGV against HYLS (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hygv-vs-hyls)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.