NHYB vs SJNK: Differences, Returns & Fees
NHYB's duration was 3.2 years on Jul 31, 2026 and SJNK's 2.3 on Jun 30, 2026; NHYB charges 0.08% to SJNK's 0.40%. Net assets: $1.7bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF, and $4.4bn on Oct 20, 2026 for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF.
NHYB costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; SJNK is 2.8 times larger.
| NHYB | SJNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.40% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $1.7bn | $4.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.5% | +1.2% |
| What it tracks | ICE BofA BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index | Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index |
| Holdings in common | 45% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
NHYB and SJNK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. NHYB follows ICE BofA BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index and SJNK follows Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index.
- Holdings in common. 45% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- Cost. NHYB charges 0.08% of assets a year and SJNK 0.40%, a gap of 0.32 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NHYB and SJNK hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
45% in common
On the same fields
NHYB and SJNK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About NHYB
NHYB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.
About SJNK
SJNK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.2% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, NHYB or SJNK?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NHYB returned +1.5% and SJNK +1.2%.
- Which is cheaper, NHYB or SJNK?
- NHYB is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NHYB against SJNK, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nhyb-vs-sjnk
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). NHYB against SJNK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nhyb-vs-sjnk
[NHYB against SJNK (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nhyb-vs-sjnk)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.