HEFA vs IMFL: Differences, Returns & Fees
HEFA and IMFL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IMFL returned +23.1% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $7.5bn for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF and $1.1bn for Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF.
IMFL costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.8 points; HEFA is 7.0 times larger.
| HEFA | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.34% |
| Net assets | $7.5bn | $1.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.3% | +23.1% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 9, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 100.0% | 21.2% |
| Below its high | 3.2%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 4.8%, high on Aug 25, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HEFA and IMFL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
HEFA and IMFL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HEFA in plain words
HEFA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 97 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
IMFL in plain words
IMFL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.34% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,155 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HEFA or IMFL?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HEFA returned +19.3% and IMFL +23.1%.
- Which is cheaper, HEFA or IMFL?
- IMFL is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HEFA against IMFL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hefa-vs-imfl
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). HEFA against IMFL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hefa-vs-imfl
[HEFA against IMFL (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hefa-vs-imfl)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.