FVD vs RSPA: how they differ
FVD and RSPA hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and RSPA returned +12.6% over the year. First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF.
RSPA costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.0 points; FVD is 6.3 times larger.
| FVD | RSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.62% | 0.29% |
| Net assets | $7.6bn | $1.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.6% | +12.6% |
| Holdings in common | 23% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 4.5% | 4.2% |
| Below its high | 6.1%, high on Aug 24, 2026 | 3.2%, high on Aug 26, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FVD and RSPA hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
23% in common
On the same fields
FVD and RSPA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FVD in plain words
FVD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.62% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 239 positions, with the top ten at 4.5%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
RSPA in plain words
RSPA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 520 positions, with the top ten at 4.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FVD or RSPA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FVD returned +6.6% and RSPA +12.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FVD or RSPA?
- RSPA is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $33. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, FVD against RSPA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fvd-vs-rspa
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FVD against RSPA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fvd-vs-rspa
[FVD against RSPA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fvd-vs-rspa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.